https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240118 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the validity of the CLB's order and recognizing substantial compliance with Section 400 of the Companies Act, 1956. It held that the CLB had jurisdiction to remove the auditor under Section 402, despite the constraints of Section 224 (7). The court granted the Appellant liberty to make further representations in the appeals filed by the Respondents against the CLB's order. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:50:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240118 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the validity of the CLB's order and recognizing substantial compliance with Section 400 of the Companies Act, 1956. It held that the CLB had jurisdiction to remove the auditor under Section 402, despite the constraints of Section 224 (7). The court granted the Appellant liberty to make further representations in the appeals filed by the Respondents against the CLB's order. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240118