<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1294 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe to stay the recovery of balance dues pending Appeals regarding the waiver of predeposit of CENVAT Credit and penalties. The case centered on the clearance of inputs triggering the need to reverse CENVAT Credit under Rule 3(5) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Despite the lack of clear evidence in records, the Tribunal acknowledged the need for further examination during the Appeal process, emphasizing the importance of maintaining proper documentation. The decision underscored the significance of evidence in supporting claims related to waste generation and clearance during manufacturing processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1294 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Applicant to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe to stay the recovery of balance dues pending Appeals regarding the waiver of predeposit of CENVAT Credit and penalties. The case centered on the clearance of inputs triggering the need to reverse CENVAT Credit under Rule 3(5) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Despite the lack of clear evidence in records, the Tribunal acknowledged the need for further examination during the Appeal process, emphasizing the importance of maintaining proper documentation. The decision underscored the significance of evidence in supporting claims related to waste generation and clearance during manufacturing processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>