<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1281 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240104</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, highlighting the lack of sufficient evidence to support the addition related to the alleged gift and the failure to produce the donor for cross-examination. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of due process and cited precedents to support its decision. The appeal was filed within the stipulated time, with the Tribunal condoning the delay due to reasonable cause. The decision was rendered on 8.2.2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2013 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1281 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240104</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, highlighting the lack of sufficient evidence to support the addition related to the alleged gift and the failure to produce the donor for cross-examination. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of due process and cited precedents to support its decision. The appeal was filed within the stipulated time, with the Tribunal condoning the delay due to reasonable cause. The decision was rendered on 8.2.2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>