<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1276 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240099</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO regarding revenue recognition, affirming the assessee&#039;s method. Additionally, the ITAT rejected the AO&#039;s disallowance of Rs.15 lakhs for reimbursed expenditure under S.40(a)(ia), agreeing with the CIT(A) that the reimbursement did not require tax deduction. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1276 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240099</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the AO regarding revenue recognition, affirming the assessee&#039;s method. Additionally, the ITAT rejected the AO&#039;s disallowance of Rs.15 lakhs for reimbursed expenditure under S.40(a)(ia), agreeing with the CIT(A) that the reimbursement did not require tax deduction. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>