<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 414 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159434</link>
    <description>A claim that sales were exempt as second sales requires the assessee to prove an earlier taxable sale in the State. The court accepted the assessing authorities&#039; reliance on a sworn admission that the bill issuer had not dealt in goods and had merely sold bills for consideration. Because the assessee did not seek cross-examination and produced no material to displace that admission, the transaction was treated as not being a genuine sale of goods. The assessee therefore failed to establish second-sale exemption, and the revision failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:47:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 414 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159434</link>
      <description>A claim that sales were exempt as second sales requires the assessee to prove an earlier taxable sale in the State. The court accepted the assessing authorities&#039; reliance on a sworn admission that the bill issuer had not dealt in goods and had merely sold bills for consideration. Because the assessee did not seek cross-examination and produced no material to displace that admission, the transaction was treated as not being a genuine sale of goods. The assessee therefore failed to establish second-sale exemption, and the revision failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>