<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 519 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159426</link>
    <description>Area-wise entertainment tax rates for cable television were upheld as valid fiscal classification under Article 14 because the metropolitan and non-metropolitan distinction supplied a rational basis and no hostile discrimination or arbitrary delegation was shown. The levy was also held not confiscatory and not to infringe Articles 19(1)(a) or 19(1)(g), since it burdened a commercial activity and did not restrict speech or trade beyond ordinary tax incidence. The authorities, however, had no statutory power to close the cable business for non-payment of tax, so business stoppage on that ground was unauthorised under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:41:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 519 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159426</link>
      <description>Area-wise entertainment tax rates for cable television were upheld as valid fiscal classification under Article 14 because the metropolitan and non-metropolitan distinction supplied a rational basis and no hostile discrimination or arbitrary delegation was shown. The levy was also held not confiscatory and not to infringe Articles 19(1)(a) or 19(1)(g), since it burdened a commercial activity and did not restrict speech or trade beyond ordinary tax incidence. The authorities, however, had no statutory power to close the cable business for non-payment of tax, so business stoppage on that ground was unauthorised under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>