https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159422 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the Trial Court and High Court, and decreed in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement and passing off case. The Court held that the second suit was not barred by Order 2 Rule 2 Sub-rule (3), CPC, as the defendants failed to establish the identity of the cause of action due to lack of pleadings from the first suit. The continuous nature of the infringement and passing off actions provided a fresh cause of action, justifying the filing of the second suit. Costs were awarded to the plaintiff. en-us Mon, 18 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jul 2014 10:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159422 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the Trial Court and High Court, and decreed in favor of the plaintiff in a trademark infringement and passing off case. The Court held that the second suit was not barred by Order 2 Rule 2 Sub-rule (3), CPC, as the defendants failed to establish the identity of the cause of action due to lack of pleadings from the first suit. The continuous nature of the infringement and passing off actions provided a fresh cause of action, justifying the filing of the second suit. Costs were awarded to the plaintiff. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 18 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159422