<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 373 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159419</link>
    <description>On remand, an assessing authority must give effect to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s final finding that blending tea did not amount to manufacture and cannot reopen that concluded issue by taking the opposite view. Judicial discipline requires subordinate revenue authorities to follow binding appellate directions and findings when completing assessment after remand. A precedent dealing with a matter left entirely open under section 7 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act was held inapplicable because the Tribunal here had already determined the character of the process. The assessing authority was therefore bound by the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:07:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 373 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159419</link>
      <description>On remand, an assessing authority must give effect to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s final finding that blending tea did not amount to manufacture and cannot reopen that concluded issue by taking the opposite view. Judicial discipline requires subordinate revenue authorities to follow binding appellate directions and findings when completing assessment after remand. A precedent dealing with a matter left entirely open under section 7 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act was held inapplicable because the Tribunal here had already determined the character of the process. The assessing authority was therefore bound by the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>