<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (12) TMI 319 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159414</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee for purchasing machinery using C forms not included in the registration certificate. The Court found insufficient evidence to support the authenticity of the letter informing the department about machinery inclusion, emphasizing the need for concrete proof. Relying on precedent and the lack of substantial evidence, the Court reinstated the penalty, highlighting the importance of adherence to tax compliance obligations under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (12) TMI 319 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159414</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee for purchasing machinery using C forms not included in the registration certificate. The Court found insufficient evidence to support the authenticity of the letter informing the department about machinery inclusion, emphasizing the need for concrete proof. Relying on precedent and the lack of substantial evidence, the Court reinstated the penalty, highlighting the importance of adherence to tax compliance obligations under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>