<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Examines Liability in Smuggling Case Involving Foreign Goods Purchase; Appellants&#039; Unawareness Claim Under Scrutiny.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16046</link>
    <description>Smuggling - Penalty - Interaction was not for supply of Indian goods but for purchasing foreign goods and therefore it is difficult to accept the contention of the appellants that they did not have knowledge of smuggled nature of goods - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 01:17:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 01:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Examines Liability in Smuggling Case Involving Foreign Goods Purchase; Appellants&#039; Unawareness Claim Under Scrutiny.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16046</link>
      <description>Smuggling - Penalty - Interaction was not for supply of Indian goods but for purchasing foreign goods and therefore it is difficult to accept the contention of the appellants that they did not have knowledge of smuggled nature of goods - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 01:17:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>