<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1258 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240081</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed Appeal Nos. ST/25/2006 and ST/180/06 due to non-compliance with stay orders but directed compliance, leading to the disposal of both appeals. The case involved a tax demand for matrimonial services, with penalties imposed but later modified by the Commissioner (Appeals). The discussion focused on the imposition of penalties under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, with the Tribunal upholding penalties in one appeal but setting aside the penalty in another due to compliance post-proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1258 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240081</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed Appeal Nos. ST/25/2006 and ST/180/06 due to non-compliance with stay orders but directed compliance, leading to the disposal of both appeals. The case involved a tax demand for matrimonial services, with penalties imposed but later modified by the Commissioner (Appeals). The discussion focused on the imposition of penalties under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, with the Tribunal upholding penalties in one appeal but setting aside the penalty in another due to compliance post-proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>