<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1228 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reviewed the genuineness of the addendum to the original MOA, upheld the price reduction claimed after importation due to discrepancies in the vessel&#039;s actual condition, and interpreted Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, acknowledging the validity of the price adjustment and directing any necessary relief to be granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:51:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1228 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reviewed the genuineness of the addendum to the original MOA, upheld the price reduction claimed after importation due to discrepancies in the vessel&#039;s actual condition, and interpreted Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, acknowledging the validity of the price adjustment and directing any necessary relief to be granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>