<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1213 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240036</link>
    <description>A 100% EOU remains entitled to EOU status until the final debonding order is issued, and goods exported during the interregnum after in-principle debonding are not treated as deemed DTA clearances. Where finished goods were exported under bond before final debonding, duty under the proviso to Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not payable on that basis. In that setting, excess duty paid on the finished goods was not recoverable as duty from a deemed domestic clearance, and the refund claim was maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1213 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240036</link>
      <description>A 100% EOU remains entitled to EOU status until the final debonding order is issued, and goods exported during the interregnum after in-principle debonding are not treated as deemed DTA clearances. Where finished goods were exported under bond before final debonding, duty under the proviso to Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not payable on that basis. In that setting, excess duty paid on the finished goods was not recoverable as duty from a deemed domestic clearance, and the refund claim was maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>