https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240035 The tribunal decided not to grant a full waiver of the pre-deposit of duty demand and penalty imposed on the company and its CEO due to their failure to attend hearings. The company was found to have manufactured goods for another entity using its machinery, leading to duty demands for unaccounted production and undervaluation of stock transferred goods. The tribunal directed the company to pay 50% of the duty within a specified time frame, with the balance dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency, emphasizing the importance of compliance by a specified date. en-us Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:29:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240035 The tribunal decided not to grant a full waiver of the pre-deposit of duty demand and penalty imposed on the company and its CEO due to their failure to attend hearings. The company was found to have manufactured goods for another entity using its machinery, leading to duty demands for unaccounted production and undervaluation of stock transferred goods. The tribunal directed the company to pay 50% of the duty within a specified time frame, with the balance dues waived and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency, emphasizing the importance of compliance by a specified date. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240035