<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1211 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the transaction between the parties did not constitute a sale, and the price difference with independent buyers was not a relevant issue raised earlier. Despite the applicant&#039;s financial challenges and prior deposit, the Tribunal directed a specific amount to be paid within a set timeframe to waive the remaining dues and stay recovery during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:29:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1211 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the transaction between the parties did not constitute a sale, and the price difference with independent buyers was not a relevant issue raised earlier. Despite the applicant&#039;s financial challenges and prior deposit, the Tribunal directed a specific amount to be paid within a set timeframe to waive the remaining dues and stay recovery during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>