<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1185 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240008</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellants, who were charged duty for ceramic tiles based on MRP assessment instead of transaction value under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit and ordered a stay against the recovery of dues during the appeal, citing previous Tribunal decisions supporting MRP-based assessment for products notified under the Legal Metrology Act. The decision highlights the importance of established legal precedents in influencing outcomes in similar cases before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:25:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1185 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240008</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellants, who were charged duty for ceramic tiles based on MRP assessment instead of transaction value under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit and ordered a stay against the recovery of dues during the appeal, citing previous Tribunal decisions supporting MRP-based assessment for products notified under the Legal Metrology Act. The decision highlights the importance of established legal precedents in influencing outcomes in similar cases before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>