https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240004 The appellant's challenge regarding alleged non-payment of excise duty under Section 11D was dismissed. The court upheld the department's demand, emphasizing the burden on the appellant to prove that the duty amount mentioned in the invoices was not recovered from customers. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 45,000 within four weeks. Upon compliance, the pre-deposit requirement for the remaining demand, interest, and penalty would be waived, with recovery stayed pending appeal disposal. en-us Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:25:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240004 The appellant's challenge regarding alleged non-payment of excise duty under Section 11D was dismissed. The court upheld the department's demand, emphasizing the burden on the appellant to prove that the duty amount mentioned in the invoices was not recovered from customers. The appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 45,000 within four weeks. Upon compliance, the pre-deposit requirement for the remaining demand, interest, and penalty would be waived, with recovery stayed pending appeal disposal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240004