https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239992 The case involved a dispute over the eligibility of manufacturers of Asbestos Cement Pressure Pipes to claim cenvat credit for service tax paid on GTA services for transporting finished goods. The appellant argued for credit eligibility based on sales being on FOR destination basis and cited legal precedents. The dispute covered two periods with contested cenvat credit amounts. The appellant contested the demand for the period before April 2008 citing conflicting tribunal judgments. The appellant sought relief from the extended demand period based on tribunal decisions during the disputed period. Pre-deposit requirements for stay applications were addressed, with directives provided based on arguments presented. en-us Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:26:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239992 The case involved a dispute over the eligibility of manufacturers of Asbestos Cement Pressure Pipes to claim cenvat credit for service tax paid on GTA services for transporting finished goods. The appellant argued for credit eligibility based on sales being on FOR destination basis and cited legal precedents. The dispute covered two periods with contested cenvat credit amounts. The appellant contested the demand for the period before April 2008 citing conflicting tribunal judgments. The appellant sought relief from the extended demand period based on tribunal decisions during the disputed period. Pre-deposit requirements for stay applications were addressed, with directives provided based on arguments presented. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239992