<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1162 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239985</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore, in a case concerning the inclusion of transport charges in the transaction value for the sale of finished goods, ruled in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the need to examine the agreements and operational procedures between the parties. Considering the arguments presented and the precedents cited, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, allowing the deduction of transportation charges from the assessable value and waiving the pre-deposit during the appeal process. This decision highlights the significance of scrutinizing contract terms and operational practices in determining the assessable value of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:26:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1162 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239985</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore, in a case concerning the inclusion of transport charges in the transaction value for the sale of finished goods, ruled in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the need to examine the agreements and operational procedures between the parties. Considering the arguments presented and the precedents cited, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, allowing the deduction of transportation charges from the assessable value and waiving the pre-deposit during the appeal process. This decision highlights the significance of scrutinizing contract terms and operational practices in determining the assessable value of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>