https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239984 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD, under the judgment by Mr. M.V. Ravindaran, directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 40,000 within eight weeks for non-compliance with Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, related to ineligible cenvat credit and duty reversal on sub-standard inputs. The waiver of pre-deposit for the remaining amounts was allowed subject to compliance, with recovery stayed until the appeal's disposal. The judge emphasized the importance of evidence and compliance with legal provisions, ordering a partial deposit due to insufficient substantiation of the appellant's claims. Compliance reporting and further review were mandated for procedural correctness. en-us Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:26:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239984 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD, under the judgment by Mr. M.V. Ravindaran, directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 40,000 within eight weeks for non-compliance with Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, related to ineligible cenvat credit and duty reversal on sub-standard inputs. The waiver of pre-deposit for the remaining amounts was allowed subject to compliance, with recovery stayed until the appeal's disposal. The judge emphasized the importance of evidence and compliance with legal provisions, ordering a partial deposit due to insufficient substantiation of the appellant's claims. Compliance reporting and further review were mandated for procedural correctness. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239984