<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1156 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239979</link>
    <description>The judgment mandates the payment of central excise duty, Cenvat duty, NCCD, AED, and Education Cess totaling significant amounts. Interest on demand is also imposed under the Central Excise Act. Penalties varying in range were levied on individuals and entities for contraventions. The Adjudicating Authority found evidence of clandestine removal of goods, leading to revenue loss. The appeal upheld the Authority&#039;s findings, emphasizing proper examination of evidence. Stay applications were dismissed, directing timely payment compliance due to prolonged delay prejudicing revenue interests. The judgment extensively covers these issues, providing detailed analysis and affirming the decisions made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:25:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1156 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239979</link>
      <description>The judgment mandates the payment of central excise duty, Cenvat duty, NCCD, AED, and Education Cess totaling significant amounts. Interest on demand is also imposed under the Central Excise Act. Penalties varying in range were levied on individuals and entities for contraventions. The Adjudicating Authority found evidence of clandestine removal of goods, leading to revenue loss. The appeal upheld the Authority&#039;s findings, emphasizing proper examination of evidence. Stay applications were dismissed, directing timely payment compliance due to prolonged delay prejudicing revenue interests. The judgment extensively covers these issues, providing detailed analysis and affirming the decisions made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>