https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239974 The Tribunal found the appellants liable for duty on finished goods removed without payment, denial of CENVAT credit on inputs, and penalties imposed. The appellants failed to obtain permission for goods removal, leading to penalties. While duty and CENVAT credit did not require pre-deposit, penalties did. The Tribunal accepted a pre-deposit offer for penalties, granting waiver and stay for the remaining penalties. The Managing Director's penalty was also addressed, emphasizing compliance with the pre-deposit within six weeks. en-us Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:25:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239974 The Tribunal found the appellants liable for duty on finished goods removed without payment, denial of CENVAT credit on inputs, and penalties imposed. The appellants failed to obtain permission for goods removal, leading to penalties. While duty and CENVAT credit did not require pre-deposit, penalties did. The Tribunal accepted a pre-deposit offer for penalties, granting waiver and stay for the remaining penalties. The Managing Director's penalty was also addressed, emphasizing compliance with the pre-deposit within six weeks. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239974