https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239960 The judgment ruled in favor of Revenue, directing the appellant in SP No. 56069 to deposit Rs. 25,00,000 and the appellant in SP No. 56176 to deposit Rs. 20,00,000 within four weeks. The court emphasized the need for thorough examination of evidence during regular hearings, acknowledging the complexity of the matter. Despite this, the balance of convenience favored Revenue, highlighting the lack of sufficient evidence by Revenue to prove that the inputs purchased were not scrap or rejects. The judgment ensured transparency by dictating and pronouncing the order in open court. en-us Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239960 The judgment ruled in favor of Revenue, directing the appellant in SP No. 56069 to deposit Rs. 25,00,000 and the appellant in SP No. 56176 to deposit Rs. 20,00,000 within four weeks. The court emphasized the need for thorough examination of evidence during regular hearings, acknowledging the complexity of the matter. Despite this, the balance of convenience favored Revenue, highlighting the lack of sufficient evidence by Revenue to prove that the inputs purchased were not scrap or rejects. The judgment ensured transparency by dictating and pronouncing the order in open court. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239960