<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1129 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239952</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit Rs.12,87,929 within 8 weeks to comply with a stay order and penalty demand. Upon this deposit, pre-deposit of balance duty and penalty for the first applicant was waived, and recovery stayed. Compliance was to be reported by a specified date, with pre-deposit of penalty against other applicants waived subject to due compliance. The judgment underscores the importance of complying with stay orders, procedural requirements, and the right to a fair hearing before rejecting an appeal on merit. It highlights the Tribunal&#039;s role in ensuring justice and procedural adherence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:18:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1129 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239952</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit Rs.12,87,929 within 8 weeks to comply with a stay order and penalty demand. Upon this deposit, pre-deposit of balance duty and penalty for the first applicant was waived, and recovery stayed. Compliance was to be reported by a specified date, with pre-deposit of penalty against other applicants waived subject to due compliance. The judgment underscores the importance of complying with stay orders, procedural requirements, and the right to a fair hearing before rejecting an appeal on merit. It highlights the Tribunal&#039;s role in ensuring justice and procedural adherence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>