<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1127 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the activity of packing, labeling, and affixing MRP labels on clutches constitutes deemed manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. The denial of credit by the Commissioner was deemed unjustified as the applicant had reversed credits on goods cleared as such, warranting a waiver of duty, interest, and penalty during the appeal process. The Tribunal allowed the applicant to avail credit on finished goods after reversing credits under the CENVAT Credit Rules, recognizing a prima facie case for relief. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper consideration of facts and compliance with procedural requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1127 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the activity of packing, labeling, and affixing MRP labels on clutches constitutes deemed manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act. The denial of credit by the Commissioner was deemed unjustified as the applicant had reversed credits on goods cleared as such, warranting a waiver of duty, interest, and penalty during the appeal process. The Tribunal allowed the applicant to avail credit on finished goods after reversing credits under the CENVAT Credit Rules, recognizing a prima facie case for relief. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper consideration of facts and compliance with procedural requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>