<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1100 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239923</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA remitted the case to the original authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing a fair hearing and consideration of all relevant documents. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the stay petition was disposed of. The judgment underscores the significance of producing original documents to substantiate claims in excise duty cases, ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellant in the adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 07:24:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1100 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239923</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA remitted the case to the original authority for a fresh decision, emphasizing a fair hearing and consideration of all relevant documents. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, and the stay petition was disposed of. The judgment underscores the significance of producing original documents to substantiate claims in excise duty cases, ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellant in the adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>