https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239902 The case involved a dispute regarding the interpretation of Notification No.8/2005-ST for business auxiliary service exemption and the applicability of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 on the clearance of semi-finished metallic springs. The Tribunal held that finished goods must be cleared on payment of duty to avail exemptions under both notifications. The waiver of pre-deposit and stay against recovery during the appeal was granted based on the appellant's compliance with CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Dec 2014 12:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239902 The case involved a dispute regarding the interpretation of Notification No.8/2005-ST for business auxiliary service exemption and the applicability of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 on the clearance of semi-finished metallic springs. The Tribunal held that finished goods must be cleared on payment of duty to avail exemptions under both notifications. The waiver of pre-deposit and stay against recovery during the appeal was granted based on the appellant's compliance with CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239902