<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1076 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239899</link>
    <description>The appellant filed stay applications against an order in appeal where demands were upheld. The appellant had already made a pre-deposit in parallel proceedings. The court found the deposit in the parallel appeal sufficient for granting stay in the present appeals. The applications for waiver of confirmed dues were allowed, and recovery stayed until appeal disposal. The court directed the appeals to be linked with the parallel appeal for joint disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 07:07:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1076 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239899</link>
      <description>The appellant filed stay applications against an order in appeal where demands were upheld. The appellant had already made a pre-deposit in parallel proceedings. The court found the deposit in the parallel appeal sufficient for granting stay in the present appeals. The applications for waiver of confirmed dues were allowed, and recovery stayed until appeal disposal. The court directed the appeals to be linked with the parallel appeal for joint disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>