https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239898 The appellant's appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals), Vapi's decision disallowing cenvat credit on outdoor catering services for the period 2008-09 to January 2011 was considered. The first appellate authority upheld the disallowance and penalty imposition. The appellant cited a Bombay High Court decision to support their argument. The court, presided over by Mr. H.K. Thakur, J., found the appellant's deposit of Rs.2,01,040/- sufficient for a stay on balance recovery pending final appeal disposal. en-us Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 24 Nov 2013 07:07:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239898 The appellant's appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals), Vapi's decision disallowing cenvat credit on outdoor catering services for the period 2008-09 to January 2011 was considered. The first appellate authority upheld the disallowance and penalty imposition. The appellant cited a Bombay High Court decision to support their argument. The court, presided over by Mr. H.K. Thakur, J., found the appellant's deposit of Rs.2,01,040/- sufficient for a stay on balance recovery pending final appeal disposal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239898