<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1060 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239883</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a society registered as a charitable institution, determining that its activities qualified as educational under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. The court emphasized that educational purposes encompass activities beyond traditional classroom settings, including conducting examinations and publishing educational materials. Regarding allegations of engaging in business activities without maintaining separate accounts, the court found the evidence lacking and remitted the matter for further examination. The court also quashed orders canceling the petitioner&#039;s registration, directing a reconsideration with detailed scrutiny. The writ petitions were allowed, and the matter was referred back to the Director General for a fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1060 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239883</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a society registered as a charitable institution, determining that its activities qualified as educational under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. The court emphasized that educational purposes encompass activities beyond traditional classroom settings, including conducting examinations and publishing educational materials. Regarding allegations of engaging in business activities without maintaining separate accounts, the court found the evidence lacking and remitted the matter for further examination. The court also quashed orders canceling the petitioner&#039;s registration, directing a reconsideration with detailed scrutiny. The writ petitions were allowed, and the matter was referred back to the Director General for a fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>