<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1049 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239872</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the case to the tribunal for detailed examination and classification of each item to determine the appropriate depreciation rate, emphasizing the need to differentiate between &quot;electrical fittings&quot; and &quot;plant and machinery.&quot; The parties were allowed to present arguments based on relevant case law, with the tribunal directed to consider and decide on the classification of items such as &quot;electrical equipment.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1049 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239872</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the case to the tribunal for detailed examination and classification of each item to determine the appropriate depreciation rate, emphasizing the need to differentiate between &quot;electrical fittings&quot; and &quot;plant and machinery.&quot; The parties were allowed to present arguments based on relevant case law, with the tribunal directed to consider and decide on the classification of items such as &quot;electrical equipment.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>