<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1046 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239869</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and restored the appeal for further consideration. The Court interpreted the newly inserted proviso to Section 148(1) of the Act, deeming the notice under Section 143(2) valid despite being served after 12 months from the filing of the return but before the reassessment time limit. This interpretation led to the conclusion that the assessments should not have been annulled but instead set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 14:09:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1046 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239869</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and restored the appeal for further consideration. The Court interpreted the newly inserted proviso to Section 148(1) of the Act, deeming the notice under Section 143(2) valid despite being served after 12 months from the filing of the return but before the reassessment time limit. This interpretation led to the conclusion that the assessments should not have been annulled but instead set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>