<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1045 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the suspension orders dated 23.5.2012 under Regulation 20(3) of CHALR, 2004, due to the failure to follow the procedural requirements under Regulation 22. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of issuing a show-cause notice as part of the enquiry process and acknowledged the appellants&#039; right to carry on their profession without undue suspension.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1045 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the suspension orders dated 23.5.2012 under Regulation 20(3) of CHALR, 2004, due to the failure to follow the procedural requirements under Regulation 22. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of issuing a show-cause notice as part of the enquiry process and acknowledged the appellants&#039; right to carry on their profession without undue suspension.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>