<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1029 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239852</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications for rectification of mistakes in the final order, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeals as time-barred. The Tribunal emphasized the need for obvious and patent mistakes for rectification, and that the re-appreciation of facts or extension of limitation periods was not permissible in the context of the case. The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority had complied with the remand order and supplied the necessary documents, ultimately concluding that the issues raised did not warrant rectification under a Review of Mistake (ROM) application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1029 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239852</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications for rectification of mistakes in the final order, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeals as time-barred. The Tribunal emphasized the need for obvious and patent mistakes for rectification, and that the re-appreciation of facts or extension of limitation periods was not permissible in the context of the case. The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority had complied with the remand order and supplied the necessary documents, ultimately concluding that the issues raised did not warrant rectification under a Review of Mistake (ROM) application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>