<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1023 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239846</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the appeal, upholding the demand for interest and the imposition of a penalty. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s arguments to be without merit and confirmed that the provisions of the law had been correctly applied by the department. The appeal was dismissed, and the order demanding interest and imposing a penalty was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1023 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239846</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the appeal, upholding the demand for interest and the imposition of a penalty. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s arguments to be without merit and confirmed that the provisions of the law had been correctly applied by the department. The appeal was dismissed, and the order demanding interest and imposing a penalty was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>