https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239844 The Tribunal rejected the preliminary objection raised by the AR regarding the extension of stay orders under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It allowed the appellant's miscellaneous applications for extension of stay orders, emphasizing the right to seek extensions beyond the stipulated period based on legal interpretations from the Supreme Court's decision in the Kumar Cotton Mills case. The Tribunal's decision aligned with principles of fairness and considered circumstances beyond the assesses' control when granting stay extensions. en-us Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239844 The Tribunal rejected the preliminary objection raised by the AR regarding the extension of stay orders under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It allowed the appellant's miscellaneous applications for extension of stay orders, emphasizing the right to seek extensions beyond the stipulated period based on legal interpretations from the Supreme Court's decision in the Kumar Cotton Mills case. The Tribunal's decision aligned with principles of fairness and considered circumstances beyond the assesses' control when granting stay extensions. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239844