https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159368 Two contemporaneous agreements forming one integrated commercial transaction were held to be covered by a broad arbitration clause in the principal agreement, so disputes under the ancillary interior design arrangement fell within the arbitral reference and the award was not void for want of jurisdiction. A jurisdictional objection on the scope of reference was not accepted at the setting-aside stage, though the Court found it unnecessary to decide the procedural bar conclusively. A claim for specific performance of an agreement of sale was held to be arbitrable, as no statutory bar excluded it. Findings on default, time being of the essence, readiness and willingness, and other factual matters could not be reopened within the narrow scope of challenge under section 34. en-us Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 May 2020 16:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159368 Two contemporaneous agreements forming one integrated commercial transaction were held to be covered by a broad arbitration clause in the principal agreement, so disputes under the ancillary interior design arrangement fell within the arbitral reference and the award was not void for want of jurisdiction. A jurisdictional objection on the scope of reference was not accepted at the setting-aside stage, though the Court found it unnecessary to decide the procedural bar conclusively. A claim for specific performance of an agreement of sale was held to be arbitrable, as no statutory bar excluded it. Findings on default, time being of the essence, readiness and willingness, and other factual matters could not be reopened within the narrow scope of challenge under section 34. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159368