<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 588 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159363</link>
    <description>Interim stay of assessment proceedings will be granted only where the applicant shows a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favours intervention. The exemption claim under the Rajasthan sales tax regime had not been placed before the District Level Screening Committee, and the eligibility certificate was confined to exemption under the Central Sales Tax Act. The stay application also omitted that the assessing authority had already rejected the claim. On those facts, no prima facie entitlement was shown and the balance of convenience did not justify interference; the request for stay was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:18:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 588 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159363</link>
      <description>Interim stay of assessment proceedings will be granted only where the applicant shows a prima facie case and the balance of convenience favours intervention. The exemption claim under the Rajasthan sales tax regime had not been placed before the District Level Screening Committee, and the eligibility certificate was confined to exemption under the Central Sales Tax Act. The stay application also omitted that the assessing authority had already rejected the claim. On those facts, no prima facie entitlement was shown and the balance of convenience did not justify interference; the request for stay was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>