<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 579 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159361</link>
    <description>Enamelled copper winding wire was classified by applying its ordinary commercial identity, functional character and predominant use. The Court held that although the wire could transmit current, its accepted commercial role was to serve as an integral part in motors, armatures, chokes and similar electrical equipment, so it fell within the category of spare parts rather than ordinary electrical goods. The common parlance and predominant user tests were applied to bring the commodity within the concessional rate under the notification issued under section 17 of the M.P. Vanijyik Kar Adhiniyam, 1994. The commodity was therefore taxable at 4% under serial No. 10.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 579 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159361</link>
      <description>Enamelled copper winding wire was classified by applying its ordinary commercial identity, functional character and predominant use. The Court held that although the wire could transmit current, its accepted commercial role was to serve as an integral part in motors, armatures, chokes and similar electrical equipment, so it fell within the category of spare parts rather than ordinary electrical goods. The common parlance and predominant user tests were applied to bring the commodity within the concessional rate under the notification issued under section 17 of the M.P. Vanijyik Kar Adhiniyam, 1994. The commodity was therefore taxable at 4% under serial No. 10.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>