https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159359 In preventive detention matters, constructive res judicata does not bar a habeas corpus challenge under Article 32 from raising grounds not urged before the High Court. Documents referred to in the grounds of detention must be supplied to the detenu with reasonable expedition so that an effective representation can be made; failure to furnish them breaches Article 22(5) and vitiates the detention. The detenu's representation must also be considered and decided by the detaining authority itself, and rejection by an officer lacking that authority is a constitutional defect affecting the validity of the detention. en-us Fri, 30 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159359 In preventive detention matters, constructive res judicata does not bar a habeas corpus challenge under Article 32 from raising grounds not urged before the High Court. Documents referred to in the grounds of detention must be supplied to the detenu with reasonable expedition so that an effective representation can be made; failure to furnish them breaches Article 22(5) and vitiates the detention. The detenu's representation must also be considered and decided by the detaining authority itself, and rejection by an officer lacking that authority is a constitutional defect affecting the validity of the detention. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 30 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159359