https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159356 The Supreme Court held that section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to appeals before bodies other than Courts, such as the Collector under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The Court affirmed that the Collector, being an executive authority, cannot invoke section 5 for condonation of delay unless expressly provided in the special enactment. The Court found that section 93 of the Act did not make section 5 of the Limitation Act applicable to proceedings before the Collector. Despite a subsequent legislative amendment, the Court dismissed the appeal, ruling it lacked merit and declined to award costs. en-us Wed, 10 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159356 The Supreme Court held that section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to appeals before bodies other than Courts, such as the Collector under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. The Court affirmed that the Collector, being an executive authority, cannot invoke section 5 for condonation of delay unless expressly provided in the special enactment. The Court found that section 93 of the Act did not make section 5 of the Limitation Act applicable to proceedings before the Collector. Despite a subsequent legislative amendment, the Court dismissed the appeal, ruling it lacked merit and declined to award costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159356