<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 994 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239817</link>
    <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus is a distinct post-import mechanism and cannot be denied merely because the importer did not challenge the bill of entry assessment or claim Notification No. 29/2010-Cus at import. The notification does not require re-assessment of the bill of entry, and refund depends on satisfaction of its own prescribed conditions. The absence of any Customs Act provision compelling an importer to avail a particular exemption supported this view, unlike the Central Excise regime. Revenue&#039;s objection based on non-challenge to assessment was therefore misplaced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 994 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239817</link>
      <description>Refund of Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus is a distinct post-import mechanism and cannot be denied merely because the importer did not challenge the bill of entry assessment or claim Notification No. 29/2010-Cus at import. The notification does not require re-assessment of the bill of entry, and refund depends on satisfaction of its own prescribed conditions. The absence of any Customs Act provision compelling an importer to avail a particular exemption supported this view, unlike the Central Excise regime. Revenue&#039;s objection based on non-challenge to assessment was therefore misplaced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>