<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 983 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the denial of Cenvat Credit based on carbon copies/extra copies of invoices was incorrect. They found that the appellant had now produced the necessary documents, and there was no dispute regarding the receipt and use of duty paid inputs. The Tribunal concluded that the denial of Cenvat Credit and imposition of penalties were unjustified, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 983 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the denial of Cenvat Credit based on carbon copies/extra copies of invoices was incorrect. They found that the appellant had now produced the necessary documents, and there was no dispute regarding the receipt and use of duty paid inputs. The Tribunal concluded that the denial of Cenvat Credit and imposition of penalties were unjustified, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>