<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 964 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239787</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition of Rs. 40,00,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the adequacy of evidence provided by the assessee, highlighting the lack of inquiry by the Assessing Officer and the failure to establish the share capital as undisclosed income. The decision was supported by various judicial precedents, stressing the importance of thorough inquiries before making such additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 06:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 964 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239787</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition of Rs. 40,00,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the adequacy of evidence provided by the assessee, highlighting the lack of inquiry by the Assessing Officer and the failure to establish the share capital as undisclosed income. The decision was supported by various judicial precedents, stressing the importance of thorough inquiries before making such additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>