<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 963 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239786</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding the sustenance of an addition under section 43B(f) for the provision of leave salary for Assessment Year 2008-09 was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT (A) and denied the deduction claimed by the assessee based on a provision without actual payment, in accordance with the amended statutory provisions requiring actual payment for claiming deductions under section 43B(f) related to leave salary provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 06:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 963 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239786</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding the sustenance of an addition under section 43B(f) for the provision of leave salary for Assessment Year 2008-09 was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT (A) and denied the deduction claimed by the assessee based on a provision without actual payment, in accordance with the amended statutory provisions requiring actual payment for claiming deductions under section 43B(f) related to leave salary provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>