<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 215 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159339</link>
    <description>Interim relief in proceedings before the Appellate Tribunal was held unavailable where the request conflicted with the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The court noted that the validity of the relevant statutory provision had already been upheld, so a stay could not be granted. It also rejected reliance on an earlier order in a different appeal because that order was limited to its own facts and did not state a general rule of law. The petition was accordingly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:32:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 215 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159339</link>
      <description>Interim relief in proceedings before the Appellate Tribunal was held unavailable where the request conflicted with the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The court noted that the validity of the relevant statutory provision had already been upheld, so a stay could not be granted. It also rejected reliance on an earlier order in a different appeal because that order was limited to its own facts and did not state a general rule of law. The petition was accordingly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>