<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 957 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the impugned order dated December 4, 2008, related to IPO irregularities, and allowed the appeal with no costs. It emphasized that while SEBI could suggest remedial measures for the depository system, the specific directions for a fresh inquiry and audit were deemed unjustified and unreasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 957 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the impugned order dated December 4, 2008, related to IPO irregularities, and allowed the appeal with no costs. It emphasized that while SEBI could suggest remedial measures for the depository system, the specific directions for a fresh inquiry and audit were deemed unjustified and unreasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>