<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 952 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239775</link>
    <description>In clandestine manufacture and clearance of man made fabrics without statutory records or duty payment, the article states that fraud and suppression with intent to evade duty defeat the argument that a show cause notice must be issued within one year of the officers&#039; visit, so the limitation objection fails. It also states that pre-notice payment of duty does not eliminate liability to interest and penalty under the Central Excise scheme where fraud and suppression are involved, particularly when a reduced-penalty option is offered but not timely exercised. The demand and penalty are therefore treated as sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 952 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239775</link>
      <description>In clandestine manufacture and clearance of man made fabrics without statutory records or duty payment, the article states that fraud and suppression with intent to evade duty defeat the argument that a show cause notice must be issued within one year of the officers&#039; visit, so the limitation objection fails. It also states that pre-notice payment of duty does not eliminate liability to interest and penalty under the Central Excise scheme where fraud and suppression are involved, particularly when a reduced-penalty option is offered but not timely exercised. The demand and penalty are therefore treated as sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>