<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 947 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239770</link>
    <description>Old and used scaffoldings classified under SH 7308 40 00 were treated as equipment for scaffoldings, and the accepted tariff classification supported that characterisation. On that basis, the goods fell within the Foreign Trade Policy treatment of equipment used for rendering services as capital goods, making such secondhand capital goods freely importable. The customs licensing restriction therefore did not apply, and the confiscation and penalties imposed under the Customs Act were held unsustainable and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 947 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239770</link>
      <description>Old and used scaffoldings classified under SH 7308 40 00 were treated as equipment for scaffoldings, and the accepted tariff classification supported that characterisation. On that basis, the goods fell within the Foreign Trade Policy treatment of equipment used for rendering services as capital goods, making such secondhand capital goods freely importable. The customs licensing restriction therefore did not apply, and the confiscation and penalties imposed under the Customs Act were held unsustainable and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>