<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 935 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239758</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs.15,00,000 as income from other sources for a cooperative housing society, rejecting the claim that the amount was reimbursement for expenses incurred in rendering services. The Tribunal found that the expenses claimed were part of regular maintenance activities and not directly related to the advertisement agreement, affirming that the agreements were structured to avoid tax on advertisement income. The alternative plea for allowing part of the common expenses was also rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 935 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239758</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs.15,00,000 as income from other sources for a cooperative housing society, rejecting the claim that the amount was reimbursement for expenses incurred in rendering services. The Tribunal found that the expenses claimed were part of regular maintenance activities and not directly related to the advertisement agreement, affirming that the agreements were structured to avoid tax on advertisement income. The alternative plea for allowing part of the common expenses was also rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>